Institution: Liberty University
Student: Synthia Phippen
Supervisor: Mrs. Wenger
Site: Liberty Christian Academy
Date: Fall 2024 - Term A (08/19/24 - 12/13/24)
Type: EDUC 225 (CT (Cooperating Teacher - Site Supervisor))
Final Completed: 12/02/24 08:31 PM
Pre-CPAST Assignment 11-22 - Mentor

General overview

Assessment

Pre-CPAST Directions

Directions – The form will be used once during the course of the term and  will be provided by the Program Coordinator to the University Supervisor, Host Teacher, and Candidate.

Additional information about and support for using the form can be found in the “Glossary” and “Look Fors” for select rows (indicated by an *) at the end of this document

 

Glossary of Terms

Analysis: Careful and critical examination of data and/or processes to identify key components and potential outcomes.

Assessment: “Process of monitoring, measuring, evaluating, documenting, reflecting on, and adjusting teaching and relearning to ensure that learners reach high levels of Achievement

Candidate: (Also known as "intern") An individual participating in a full-time field experience in a P12 classroom in order to obtain professional education licensure/certification.

Cooperating Teachers: (Also known as “mentor teachers”) Teachers in schools who mentor and supervise student teachers in their classrooms for the duration of a student teaching and/or field experience.

Data-informed decisions: “Focuses on using student assessment data and relevant background information to inform decisions related to planning and implementing instructional strategies at the district, school, classroom, and individual student levels.”

Developmental Theory (General): Theories that describe the stages of development of children/adolescents (e.g., Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development, Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development, Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, Behavioral Theories, and Sociocultural Theories).

Developmental Theory (Content-Specific): Content-specific teaching that organizes activities and learning tasks to help learners move from one level to the next.

Evidence: Artifacts that document and demonstrate how [the student teacher] planned and implemented instruction

Feedback: “Information communicated to the learner that is intended to modify the learner’s thinking or behavior for the purpose of improving learning.”

Formative Assessment: “Assessment used continuously throughout learning and teaching, allowing teachers to adjust instruction to improve learner achievement.”

Goals: See definition for “Measurable Goals.”

Learner: Any P12 student in the student teacher’s classroom.

Learning Environment: Any setting where learning occurs. The term may refer to the physical environment (e.g., the classroom), as well as the classroom management procedures and activities that enable teaching and learning to take place.

Measurable Goals: “Provides information for describing, assessing, and evaluating student achievement.”

Mentor Teachers: See definition for “Cooperating Teachers.”

Objectives/Targets: P12 student (learner) learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the lesson or learning segment.

Problem Solving: A mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue.

Program Coordinator: Faculty or staff member from a college or university who coordinates/manages the administrative components of a teacher educator licensure program. 

Research: "The use of rigorous, systematic, and objective methodologies to obtain reliable and valid knowledge."

Targets: See definition for 'Objectives/Targets.'

University Supervisor (US): The university instructor assigned to the student teacher who regularly observes his/her performance to provide feedback on strengths and weaknesses. The US coordinates the student teacher’s evaluation, and is responsible for recording the consensus scores using this form.

Section Weight: 0%
Suggested Letter Grade Rubric

Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort in the placement.

ABCDF

Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort during the practicum. (1.000, 100.0%)

Final
Required
A    
Section Weight: 0%
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

A. Focus for Learning:
Standards and Objectives/Target
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.7.a

Plans align to appropriate P-12 state Learning
Standards AND Goals are measurable AND
Standards, objectives/ targets, and learning tasks
are consistently aligned with each other AND
Articulates objectives/targets that are appropriate
for learners
Plans align to appropriate P-12 state Learning
Standards AND/OR Some goals are measurable
AND/OR Standards, objectives/targets, and
learning tasks, are loosely or are not consistently
aligned with each other AND/OR Articulates some
objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners
Plans do not align to the appropriate P-12 state
Learning Standards AND/OR Goals are absent or
not measurable AND/OR Standards,
objectives/targets, and learning tasks are not
aligned with each other AND/OR Does not
articulate objectives/targets that are appropriate for
learners

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Excellent focus on the objectives and on alignment with standards.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

B. Assessment of P-12 Learning
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.6.b

Planned assessments 1. Provide opportunities for
learners to illustrate competence 2. Align with the
P-12 state Learning Standards
Planned assessments 1. Provide opportunities for
some learners to illustrate competence OR 2. Align
with the P-12 state Learning Standards
Planned assessments 1. Are not included OR 2. Do
not align with the P-12 state Learning Standards

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Assessment was aligned with objective and standards.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

C. Learning Target and Directions
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.7.c

Articulates an accurate and clear learning target
AND
Articulates accurate directions/explanations
AND
Sequences learning experiences appropriately
Articulates an inaccurate or unclear learning target
AND/OR
Articulates inaccurate directions/explanations
Does not articulate the learning target
OR
Does not articulate directions/explanations

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Directions, explanations and learning goals were all clear and learning activities were sequenced appropriately.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

D. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting

 Instruction through Formative Assessment
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.8.b

Checks for understanding (whole class/group)
during lessons using formative assessment AND
Differentiates through adjustments to instruction
(whole class/group)
Inconsistently checks for understanding during
lessons using formative assessment AND Adjusts
instruction accordingly, but adjustments may cause
additional confusion
Does not check for understanding during lessons
using formative assessment OR Does not make
any adjustments based on learners’ responses

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Formative assessments throughout the lesson and students were given additional assistance as needed.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

E. Digital Tools and Resources
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.2 InTASC-2017.5.l InTASC-2017.6.i

Discusses AND uses developmentally appropriate
technologies (digital tools and resources) that 1.
Are relevant to learning objectives/ targets of the
lesson 2. Engage learners in the demonstration of
knowledge or skills
Discusses developmentally appropriate
technologies (digital tools and resources) relevant
to learning objectives/ targets of the lesson AND
Technology is not available
One of the following: A. Does not use technologies
(digital tools and resources) to engage learners
AND Technology is available in the setting OR B.
Use of technologies is not relevant to the learning
objectives/ targets of the lesson OR C. Does not
discuss technologies AND Technology is not
available in the setting

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Used appropriate and varied resources to enhance instruction.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

F. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1 InTASC-2017.3.d

Manages a safe and respectful learning
environment through the use of routines and
transitions (i.e., classroom management) AND
Establishes and promotes constructive
relationships to equitably engage learners
Attempts to manage a safe learning environment
through the use of routines and transitions (i.e.,
classroom management) AND/OR Attempts to
establish constructive relationships to engage
learners
Does not manage a safe learning environment (i.e.,
insufficient classroom management) OR Does not
establish constructive relationships to engage
learners

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Great classroom management.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

G. Data- Guided Instruction
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.6.l

Uses data-informed decisions to design instruction
and assessment
Uses minimal data to design instruction and
assessment
Does not use data to design instruction and
assessment

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Met and discussed lesson instructions and assessments to ensure they were aligned with student abilities and progress.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

H. Feedback to Learners
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.6.d

Provides feedback that 1. Enables learners to
recognize strengths OR areas for improvement
AND Provides timely feedback
Provides minimal feedback that 1. Enables learners
to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement
OR Feedback is provided in a somewhat timely
fashion
Does not provide feedback OR Feedback does not
enable learners to recognize strengths OR areas
for improvement OR Feedback is not provided in a
timely fashion

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Provided feedback during lessons and looked over evaluations to gauge student achievement.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

I. Assessment Techniques
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.7.d

Evaluates and supports learning through

assessment techniques that are 1. Developmentally
appropriate 2. Formative

Assessment techniques are 1. Developmentally
appropriate 2. Formative
Assessment techniques are 1. Developmentally
inappropriate OR Not used

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Assessment matched objective and target goals and were appropriate.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

J. Connections to Research and Theory
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1

Discusses and provides evidence of connections to
educational research and/or theory
Mentions connections to educational research
and/or theory
No connections OR inaccurate connections to
educational research and/or theory

Question Comments : *Comment Required
We discussed this when planning the lesson.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

K. Demonstrates Punctuality
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 InTASC-2017.9.o

Reports on time for experience AND Additional
teacher engagements (e.g., IEPs, teacher
committees)
Inconsistently reports on time for experience
AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,
IEPs, teacher committees)
Does not report on time for experience AND/OR
Additional teacher engagements (e.g., IEPs,
teacher committees)

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Always on time and good communication.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

L. Meets Deadlines and Obligations
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 InTASC-2017.9.o

Meets deadlines and obligations established by the
cooperating teacher, instructor, and/or supervisor
AND Informs all stakeholders (cooperating teacher,
supervisor, instructor, and/or faculty members) of
absences prior to the absence
Most of the time meets deadlines and obligations
established by the cooperating teacher, instructor,
and/or supervisor AND Informs some stakeholders
(cooperating teacher, supervisor, instructor, and/or
faculty members) of absences prior to the absence
Frequently misses deadlines or obligations
established by the cooperating teacher, instructor,
and/or supervisor AND/OR Does not inform
stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor,
instructor, and/or faculty members) of absences
prior to the absence

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Met deadlines and communicated regarding any attendance changes.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

M. Collaboration
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 InTASC-2017.10.b

Demonstrates collaborative relationships with
cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the
school community (other teachers, school
personnel, administrators, etc.) AND Attempts to
work with and learn from colleagues in planning
and implementing instruction
Demonstrates collaborative relationships with
cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the
school community (other teachers, school
personnel, administrators, etc.)
Does not demonstrate collaborative relationships
with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the
school community (other teachers, school
personnel, administrators, etc.)

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Collaborated regarding lesson and prior to working with individuals or small groups of students.
Meets Expectations
  Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism
(1.000, 7.1%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 InTASC-2017.9.n

Is receptive to feedback, constructive criticism,
supervision, and responds professionally AND
Incorporates feedback (e.g., from cooperating
teacher, university supervisor) to improve practice
Is receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, and
supervision AND/OR Incorporates feedback
inconsistently
Is not receptive to feedback, constructive criticism,
and supervision AND/OR Does not incorporate
feedback

Question Comments : *Comment Required
Always willing to receive feedback.
Meets Expectations
Section Weight: 0%
School Setting: Part A

School Setting (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) (1.000, 100.0%)


Question Comments :
City
Section Weight: 0%

Element 1Method of Instructional Delivery (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) (1.000, 100.0%)


Question Comments :
In Person Only
Section Weight: 0%
Directions for Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric

Dear Host Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, or On-site Mentor,

Before completing the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP assessment, please review the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP Scorer Training video. This video will explain the importance of this assessment and will provide direction on how to accurately score the candidate using the instrument. The video is less than 15 minutes in length. Here is the link: https://watch.liberty.edu/media/t/1_103thmlr 

Also attached is a copy of the PowerPoint used in the video in case you would like to refer back to the slides after watching the training. Thank you so much for investing in the training and preparation of future educators!

Attachments: SCRIP__Pre_SCRIP_Scorer_Training_200602.pptx 

  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

A. Social Responsibility
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-
Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.9.m NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3

The candidate demonstrates a sense of fairness,
justice, and equity for all students
The candidate states that all students can learn
BUT the candidate’s actions do not confirm the
belief.
No evidence provided.

Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

B. Social Responsibility
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-
Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.10.c NASDTEC-MCEE-
2015.3

The candidate interacts effectively with students
and/or teachers to provide a positive, structured,
safe learning environment.
The classroom environment is lacking in positive
affirmation, structure, OR safety.
No evidence provided.

Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

C. Commitment
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-
Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.10.p NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1

The candidate follows through on commitments and
takes responsibilities seriously while meeting
deadlines
The candidate makes commitments that he/she is
unable to keep.
No evidence provided.

Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

D. Commitment
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-
Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.9.k NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1

The candidate shows the self-discipline and work
ethic essential to be planned, prepared and
organized for successful instruction and learning/ or
leadership and supervision to occur.
AND
The candidate completes assigned tasks on time.
The candidate’s lack of planning, preparation, or
organization hinders successful instruction or
leadership. OR
The candidate completes assigned tasks after the
deadline.
No evidence provided.

Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

E. Reflective Practice
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-
Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.9.c NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2

The candidate thoughtfully considers educational matters and the practice of teaching to make
informed decisions
The candidate spends little time reflecting on the
practice of teaching to make informed decisions.
No evidence provided.

Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

F. Reflective Practice
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.9.c NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2

 

The candidate makes choices after pondering ideas
and experiences.
The candidate acts quickly before thinking about
the results.
No evidence provided.

 


Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

G. Integrity
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.9.o NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2

The candidate models good citizenship
and acts in an ethical and moral manner.
AND
The candidate values honesty inside and outside of
the classroom and school.
The candidate does not follow the rules or the law. OR
The candidate acts in a way which causes others to
question his/her ethics or morals.
No evidence provided.

 


Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

H. Integrity
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

ISTE.2.3 ISTE.LDR.3 InTASC-2017.10.g

NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.5

The candidate demonstrates a positive commitment
to consuming, creating, distributing, and
communicating information through all
technologies.
The candidate lacks professional discretion when
consuming, creating, distributing, and/or
communicating through the use of all technologies.
No evidence provided.

 


Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

I. Professionalism
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.10.c NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2

The candidate demonstrates appropriate behavior;
possesses patience, self-control, and flexibility
when obstacles or difficult situations occur.
AND
The candidate manages personal emotions and
feelings and reacts reasonably to situations.
AND
The candidate acts confidently and maturely.
The candidate is impatient or inflexible, lacks
personal management skills and confidence.
No evidence provided.

 


Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
  Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt)

J. Professionalism
(1.000, 10.0%)

CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

InTASC-2017.9.c NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2

The candidate effectively uses the English
language in speech and writing. 
The candidate has many errors in written
communication. 
No evidence provided.

 


Question Comments :
Level 2: Met - Proficient
Directions for Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric Comments : *Comment Required
Separating the Pre-Scrip video from the Scrip video would be helpful. It would be less confusing for us and take less time for us to watch.
Overall Evaluation Comments
Comments: *Required
I enjoyed working with Synthia this semester. She helped my students master concepts and skills when they struggled with them and my students enjoyed working with her. She is welcome back any time.
Evaluation Score Summary
Title: Score Weight Adj. Score  
Primary Evaluation 0.00 100.00% 0.00 Finalized
0.00