|
General overview
Assessment
Pre-CPAST Directions
Directions – The form will be used once during the course of the term and will be provided by the Program Coordinator to the University Supervisor, Host Teacher, and Candidate.
Additional information about and support for using the form can be found in the “Glossary” and “Look Fors” for select rows (indicated by an *) at the end of this document
Glossary of Terms
Analysis: Careful and critical examination of data and/or processes to identify key components and potential outcomes.
Assessment: “Process of monitoring, measuring, evaluating, documenting, reflecting on, and adjusting teaching and relearning to ensure that learners reach high levels of Achievement
Candidate: (Also known as "intern") An individual participating in a full-time field experience in a P12 classroom in order to obtain professional education licensure/certification.
Cooperating Teachers: (Also known as “mentor teachers”) Teachers in schools who mentor and supervise student teachers in their classrooms for the duration of a student teaching and/or field experience.
Data-informed decisions: “Focuses on using student assessment data and relevant background information to inform decisions related to planning and implementing instructional strategies at the district, school, classroom, and individual student levels.”
Developmental Theory (General): Theories that describe the stages of development of children/adolescents (e.g., Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development, Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development, Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, Behavioral Theories, and Sociocultural Theories).
Developmental Theory (Content-Specific): Content-specific teaching that organizes activities and learning tasks to help learners move from one level to the next.
Evidence: Artifacts that document and demonstrate how [the student teacher] planned and implemented instruction
Feedback: “Information communicated to the learner that is intended to modify the learner’s thinking or behavior for the purpose of improving learning.”
Formative Assessment: “Assessment used continuously throughout learning and teaching, allowing teachers to adjust instruction to improve learner achievement.”
Goals: See definition for “Measurable Goals.”
Learner: Any P12 student in the student teacher’s classroom.
Learning Environment: Any setting where learning occurs. The term may refer to the physical environment (e.g., the classroom), as well as the classroom management procedures and activities that enable teaching and learning to take place.
Measurable Goals: “Provides information for describing, assessing, and evaluating student achievement.”
Mentor Teachers: See definition for “Cooperating Teachers.”
Objectives/Targets: P12 student (learner) learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the lesson or learning segment.
Problem Solving: A mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue.
Program Coordinator: Faculty or staff member from a college or university who coordinates/manages the administrative components of a teacher educator licensure program.
Research: "The use of rigorous, systematic, and objective methodologies to obtain reliable and valid knowledge."
Targets: See definition for 'Objectives/Targets.'
University Supervisor (US): The university instructor assigned to the student teacher who regularly observes his/her performance to provide feedback on strengths and weaknesses. The US coordinates the student teacher’s evaluation, and is responsible for recording the consensus scores using this form.
|
|
|
A | B | C | D | F |
|
|
| | | | |
Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort during the practicum. (1.000, 100.0%) | Final Required | A | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Target (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.7.a
|
Plans align to appropriate P-12 state Learning Standards AND Goals are measurable AND Standards, objectives/ targets, and learning tasks are consistently aligned with each other AND Articulates objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners |
Plans align to appropriate P-12 state Learning Standards AND/OR Some goals are measurable AND/OR Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks, are loosely or are not consistently aligned with each other AND/OR Articulates some objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners |
Plans do not align to the appropriate P-12 state Learning Standards AND/OR Goals are absent or not measurable AND/OR Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks are not aligned with each other AND/OR Does not articulate objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Excellent focus on the objectives and on alignment with standards.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
B. Assessment of P-12 Learning (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.6.b
|
Planned assessments 1. Provide opportunities for learners to illustrate competence 2. Align with the P-12 state Learning Standards |
Planned assessments 1. Provide opportunities for some learners to illustrate competence OR 2. Align with the P-12 state Learning Standards |
Planned assessments 1. Are not included OR 2. Do not align with the P-12 state Learning Standards |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Assessment was aligned with objective and standards.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
C. Learning Target and Directions (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.7.c
|
Articulates an accurate and clear learning target AND Articulates accurate directions/explanations AND Sequences learning experiences appropriately |
Articulates an inaccurate or unclear learning target AND/OR Articulates inaccurate directions/explanations |
Does not articulate the learning target OR Does not articulate directions/explanations |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Directions, explanations and learning goals were all clear and learning activities were sequenced appropriately.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
D. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting
Instruction through Formative Assessment (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.8.b
|
Checks for understanding (whole class/group) during lessons using formative assessment AND Differentiates through adjustments to instruction (whole class/group) |
Inconsistently checks for understanding during lessons using formative assessment AND Adjusts instruction accordingly, but adjustments may cause additional confusion |
Does not check for understanding during lessons using formative assessment OR Does not make any adjustments based on learners’ responses |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Formative assessments throughout the lesson and students were given additional assistance as needed.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
E. Digital Tools and Resources (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.2 InTASC-2017.5.l InTASC-2017.6.i
|
Discusses AND uses developmentally appropriate technologies (digital tools and resources) that 1. Are relevant to learning objectives/ targets of the lesson 2. Engage learners in the demonstration of knowledge or skills |
Discusses developmentally appropriate technologies (digital tools and resources) relevant to learning objectives/ targets of the lesson AND Technology is not available |
One of the following: A. Does not use technologies (digital tools and resources) to engage learners AND Technology is available in the setting OR B. Use of technologies is not relevant to the learning objectives/ targets of the lesson OR C. Does not discuss technologies AND Technology is not available in the setting |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Used appropriate and varied resources to enhance instruction.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
F. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1 InTASC-2017.3.d
|
Manages a safe and respectful learning environment through the use of routines and transitions (i.e., classroom management) AND Establishes and promotes constructive relationships to equitably engage learners |
Attempts to manage a safe learning environment through the use of routines and transitions (i.e., classroom management) AND/OR Attempts to establish constructive relationships to engage learners |
Does not manage a safe learning environment (i.e., insufficient classroom management) OR Does not establish constructive relationships to engage learners |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Great classroom management.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
G. Data- Guided Instruction (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.6.l
|
Uses data-informed decisions to design instruction and assessment |
Uses minimal data to design instruction and assessment |
Does not use data to design instruction and assessment |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Met and discussed lesson instructions and assessments to ensure they were aligned with student abilities and progress.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
H. Feedback to Learners (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.6.d
|
Provides feedback that 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement AND Provides timely feedback |
Provides minimal feedback that 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement OR Feedback is provided in a somewhat timely fashion |
Does not provide feedback OR Feedback does not enable learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement OR Feedback is not provided in a timely fashion |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Provided feedback during lessons and looked over evaluations to gauge student achievement.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
I. Assessment Techniques (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 InTASC-2017.7.d
|
Evaluates and supports learning through
assessment techniques that are 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative
|
Assessment techniques are 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative |
Assessment techniques are 1. Developmentally inappropriate OR Not used |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Assessment matched objective and target goals and were appropriate.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
J. Connections to Research and Theory (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
|
Discusses and provides evidence of connections to educational research and/or theory |
Mentions connections to educational research and/or theory |
No connections OR inaccurate connections to educational research and/or theory |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
We discussed this when planning the lesson.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
K. Demonstrates Punctuality (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 InTASC-2017.9.o
|
Reports on time for experience AND Additional teacher engagements (e.g., IEPs, teacher committees) |
Inconsistently reports on time for experience AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g., IEPs, teacher committees) |
Does not report on time for experience AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g., IEPs, teacher committees) |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Always on time and good communication.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
L. Meets Deadlines and Obligations (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 InTASC-2017.9.o
|
Meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher, instructor, and/or supervisor AND Informs all stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, instructor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence |
Most of the time meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher, instructor, and/or supervisor AND Informs some stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, instructor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence |
Frequently misses deadlines or obligations established by the cooperating teacher, instructor, and/or supervisor AND/OR Does not inform stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, instructor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Met deadlines and communicated regarding any attendance changes.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
M. Collaboration (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 InTASC-2017.10.b
|
Demonstrates collaborative relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.) AND Attempts to work with and learn from colleagues in planning and implementing instruction |
Demonstrates collaborative relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.) |
Does not demonstrate collaborative relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.) |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Collaborated regarding lesson and prior to working with individuals or small groups of students.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
| |
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pt) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt) |
|
N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism (1.000, 7.1%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 InTASC-2017.9.n
|
Is receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, supervision, and responds professionally AND Incorporates feedback (e.g., from cooperating teacher, university supervisor) to improve practice |
Is receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, and supervision AND/OR Incorporates feedback inconsistently |
Is not receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, and supervision AND/OR Does not incorporate feedback |
|
|
Question Comments : *Comment Required
|
|
Always willing to receive feedback.
|
|
Meets Expectations |
School Setting (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) (1.000, 100.0%) |
|
City |
Element 1Method of Instructional Delivery (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) (1.000, 100.0%) |
|
In Person Only |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
A. Social Responsibility (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP- Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.9.m NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3
|
The candidate demonstrates a sense of fairness, justice, and equity for all students |
The candidate states that all students can learn BUT the candidate’s actions do not confirm the belief. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
B. Social Responsibility (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised- Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.10.c NASDTEC-MCEE- 2015.3
|
The candidate interacts effectively with students and/or teachers to provide a positive, structured, safe learning environment. |
The classroom environment is lacking in positive affirmation, structure, OR safety. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
C. Commitment (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised- Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.10.p NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1
|
The candidate follows through on commitments and takes responsibilities seriously while meeting deadlines |
The candidate makes commitments that he/she is unable to keep. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
D. Commitment (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised- Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.9.k NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1
|
The candidate shows the self-discipline and work ethic essential to be planned, prepared and organized for successful instruction and learning/ or leadership and supervision to occur. AND The candidate completes assigned tasks on time. |
The candidate’s lack of planning, preparation, or organization hinders successful instruction or leadership. OR The candidate completes assigned tasks after the deadline. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
E. Reflective Practice (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised- Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.9.c NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2
|
The candidate thoughtfully considers educational matters and the practice of teaching to make informed decisions |
The candidate spends little time reflecting on the practice of teaching to make informed decisions. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
F. Reflective Practice (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.9.c NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2
|
The candidate makes choices after pondering ideas and experiences. |
The candidate acts quickly before thinking about the results. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
G. Integrity (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.9.o NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2
|
The candidate models good citizenship and acts in an ethical and moral manner. AND The candidate values honesty inside and outside of the classroom and school. |
The candidate does not follow the rules or the law. OR The candidate acts in a way which causes others to question his/her ethics or morals. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
H. Integrity (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
ISTE.2.3 ISTE.LDR.3 InTASC-2017.10.g
NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.5
|
The candidate demonstrates a positive commitment to consuming, creating, distributing, and communicating information through all technologies. |
The candidate lacks professional discretion when consuming, creating, distributing, and/or communicating through the use of all technologies. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
I. Professionalism (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.10.c NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2
|
The candidate demonstrates appropriate behavior; possesses patience, self-control, and flexibility when obstacles or difficult situations occur. AND The candidate manages personal emotions and feelings and reacts reasonably to situations. AND The candidate acts confidently and maturely. |
The candidate is impatient or inflexible, lacks personal management skills and confidence. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing (1.000 pt) |
Level 0: No Evidence (0.000 pt) |
|
J. Professionalism (1.000, 10.0%)
CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
InTASC-2017.9.c NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2
|
The candidate effectively uses the English language in speech and writing. |
The candidate has many errors in written communication. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met - Proficient |
| Directions for Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric Comments : *Comment Required |
|
Separating the Pre-Scrip video from the Scrip video would be helpful. It would be less confusing for us and take less time for us to watch.
|
|
| Comments: *Required |
| I enjoyed working with Synthia this semester. She helped my students master concepts and skills when they struggled with them and my students enjoyed working with her. She is welcome back any time.
|
|