|
CAEP
SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric (COSC 693/COSC 694) -Site Supervisor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
A. Social Responsibility
|
The candidate demonstrates a sense of fairness,
justice, and equity for all students AND demonstrates empathy and
sensitivity to human needs.
|
The candidate demonstrates a sense of fairness,
justice, and equity for all students.
|
The candidate states that all students can learn BUT
the candidate’s actions do not confirm the belief.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
B. Social Responsibility
|
The candidate interacts effectively with students
and/or teachers to provide a positive, structured, safe learning
environment and creates a learning environment where student access,
success, and achievement are priority.
|
The candidate interacts effectively with students
and/or teachers to provide a positive, structured, safe learning
environment.
|
The classroom environment is lacking in positive
affirmation, structure, OR safety.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
C. Commitment
|
The candidate follows through on commitments and takes
responsibilities seriously while meeting deadlines. AND The candidate
demonstrates a persevering commitment to the mission and vision of the
school and each student’s learning success.
|
The candidate follows through on commitments and takes
responsibilities seriously while meeting deadlines.
|
The candidate makes commitments that he/she is unable
to keep.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
D. Commitment
|
The candidate shows the extraordinary self-
discipline and work ethic essential to be planned, prepared and
organized for successful instruction and learning/ or leadership and
supervision to occur. AND The candidate consistently completes assigned
tasks ahead of time.
|
The candidate shows the self- discipline and work
ethic essential to be planned, prepared and organized for successful
instruction and learning/ or leadership and supervision to occur. AND The
candidate completes assigned tasks on time.
|
The candidate’s lack of planning, preparation, or
organization hinders successful instruction or leadership. OR The
candidate completes assigned tasks after the deadline.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
E. Reflective Practice
|
The candidate thoughtfully considers educational
matters, the practice of teaching, and utilizes data to make informed
decisions regarding educational matters and the practice of teaching to
implement change.
|
The candidate thoughtfully considers educational
matters and the practice of teaching to make informed decisions.
|
The candidate spends little time reflecting on the
practice of teaching to make informed decisions.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
F. Reflective Practice
|
The candidate makes choices after pondering ideas,
experiences, research, and engages in collaboration with colleagues when
appropriate.
|
The candidate makes choices after pondering ideas and
experiences.
|
The candidate acts quickly before thinking about the
results.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
G. Integrity
|
The candidate models exemplary citizenship and
displays moral leadership. AND The candidate values honesty inside and
outside of the classroom. AND The candidate abides by a professional code
of ethics and standards of practice.
|
The candidate models good citizenship and acts in an
ethical and moral manner. AND The candidate values honesty inside and
outside of the classroom.
|
The candidate does not follow the rules or the law. OR
The candidate acts in a way which causes others to question his/her
ethics or morals.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
H. Integrity
|
The candidate demonstrates exemplary commitment to
consuming, creating, distributing, and communicating information through
all technologies to build local and global learning communities, both
personally and professionally.
|
The candidate demonstrates a positive commitment to
consuming, creating, distributing, and communicating information through
all technologies.
|
The candidate lacks professional discretion when
consuming, creating, distributing, and/or communicating through the use
of all technologies.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
I. Professionalism
|
The candidate demonstrates exemplary behavior;
possesses patience, self-control, and flexibility when obstacles or
difficult situations occur. AND The candidate effectively manages
personal emotions and feelings and reacts reasonably to situations. AND The
candidate acts confidently and maturely taking responsibility in
leadership. AND The candidate maintains enthusiasm and passion for the
teaching profession and views learning as a life-long activity.
|
The candidate demonstrates appropriate behavior;
possesses patience, self-control, and flexibility when obstacles or
difficult situations occur. AND The candidate manages personal emotions
and feelings and reacts reasonably to situations. AND The candidate acts
confidently and maturely.
|
The candidate is impatient or inflexible, lacks
personal management skills and confidence.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Met-Advanced
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient
|
Level 1: Not Met-Developing
|
Level 0: No Evidence
|
|
J. Professionalism
|
The candidate effectively uses the English language in
speech and writing. AND The candidate consistently supports writings with
research and professional perspectives.
|
The candidate effectively uses the English language in
speech and writing.
|
The candidate has many errors in written
communication.
|
No evidence provided.
|
|
|
Level 3: Met- Advanced
|
|
|
Evaluation
Score Summary
|
|
Title:
|
Score
|
Weight
|
Adj. Score
|
|
|
Primary Evaluation >
|
0.00
|
0.00%
|
0.00
|
Finalized
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|